If you want to respond to the content of the article (which is about policy differences) please do so. I would appreciate. Your responses sound like you want to make it about your agenda. If you want to argue whether Jackson is anti-Jewish, write something for Medium on that.

Jackson’s statement was anti-Jewish; it does not mean he is anti-Jewish. Prime MInister Trudeau wearing black face does not mean he is a racist; yet, that was a racist act. There is a difference. Does Jackson believe the Jewish people or Jews should not be allowed to live a constructive existence? No. He never said anything of the sort. The n word is hateful, the f word, and all sorts of words in that vein. If black people dismissed everyone who said anything or engaged in any racist act against them, it would be most of the people they encounter. But racist statements is way different from being a racist. I personally gave Bloomberg the benefit of the doubt. I would have considered voting for him. Just like I gave Bill Clinton a strong look in 1996. In the end, I could not do it; his policies are too corporate, and were anti-black. Unlike Bloomberg, Clinton never admitted his policies were bad for black people.

And to close, like I began, if you want to address the content of the commentary I wrote, please do so. Otherwise, I leave it there.