Thanks for responding. Should note that my response is not refuting your point at all (not a refutation by design) So, don't take me wrong. The fact that my point is ancedotal (this is accurate) should tell anyone why ancedotal evidence is not good to use. Eventually, one will need more. Anti-racist efforts in school are being attacked effectively right now with ancedotal instances of bad ideas for teaching history. The vast majority of efforts to educate children on real American history don't even get an audience. I am not accusing you of cherry picking either. I jjust think more extensive proof of something works better.